Since 2013, Zimbabwe has embraced the devolution of governance. Like all public frameworks, devolution has had its share of pros and cons. A case study was carried out to determine these effects, particularly how devolution impacts climate change resilience efforts in Sanyati District. The study, guided by the devolution concept of governance and a total disaster risk management approach, spanned from February to August 2024. It employed the Interpretivist Philosophy and Qualitative Research Approach, gathering both primary and secondary data through systematic literature review and expert interviews to corroborate the findings. Analysis was done using content and thematic methods, with results primarily presented in text. The study found that devolution largely bolstered climate change adaptation in the district. However, it also identified significant challenges: centralized control of climate change resources, capacity deficiencies at lower government levels, inadequate central government adherence to the constitution, policy misalignment, ineffective communication and coordination, and political meddling. The findings suggest that a centralized state lacks the agility and innovation needed for effective climate change response, and that a uniform approach is too simplistic. The study advises that entities like the Civil Protection and Climate Change Directorate should take the lead in climate change adaptation efforts.